|regular expression question firstname.lastname@example.org (Gijs) (2005-06-08)|
|Re: regular expression question email@example.com (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-06-08)|
|Re: regular expression question firstname.lastname@example.org (Karsten Nyblad) (2005-06-08)|
|Re: regular expression question email@example.com (2005-06-08)|
|Re: regular expression question firstname.lastname@example.org (Gijs) (2005-06-09)|
|Re: regular expression question email@example.com (Nicola Musatti) (2005-06-09)|
|Re: regular expression question cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-06-09)|
|Re: regular expression question firstname.lastname@example.org (Scott Nicol) (2005-06-10)|
|[5 later articles]|
|From:||glen herrmannsfeldt <email@example.com>|
|Date:||8 Jun 2005 22:31:01 -0400|
|Posted-Date:||08 Jun 2005 22:31:00 EDT|
> Don't know if this is the right group for this. Can anyone tell me how
> to create a regular expression that matches all except for one string?
> I tried to use the complement sign ^, but this is only usable for one
> character, not for a whole string.
> So for example I want to have a RE that matches all strings except for
> the string "hello". How do you do this?
> [It's not a dumb question, it's a hard question. The complement of a RE
> is usually not a RE. My practical advice would be to look for "hello" and
> reverse the sense of the test in the surrounding code. -John]
Maybe I missed the question, but the one time this happened to me,
was in PSL, the Pattern Specification Language for
the Paracel FDF, which is a little more general than RE. I needed to
find a specific word not followed by another specific word. With the
added complication of word boundary detection, and with a RE form
that allows an OR operation, something like:
[a-gi-z] | [h][a-df-z] | [h][e][a-km-z] | [h][e][l][a-km-z] |
[Actually, I was wrong. See subsequent messages. -John]
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.