Re: Avoid "symbol" and "token" terms ambiguity

vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
3 Feb 2005 22:44:38 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Avoid "symbol" and "token" terms ambiguity basil@ulstu.ru (Vasily Karyaev) (2005-01-09)
Re: Avoid "symbol" and "token" terms ambiguity vbdis@aol.com (2005-01-30)
Re: Avoid "symbol" and "token" terms ambiguity vbdis@aol.com (2005-02-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 3 Feb 2005 22:44:38 -0500
Organization: AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
References: 05-01-114
Keywords: practice
Posted-Date: 03 Feb 2005 22:44:38 EST

vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) schreibt:

>>1. "A grammar symbol (token)".
>>2. "A parser symbol (token)".
>
>You have 2 grammars, one for the lexer and one for the parser.

I forgot to add:

Since we usually only talk about one of these grammars, the parser grammar, a
separation of the symbols into "terminals" and "nonterminals" might be
sufficient.

DoDi

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.