Re: Using Bison and Delphi

vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
28 Nov 2004 23:19:41 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Using Bison and Delphi mikehahn@rogers.com (Mike Hahn) (2004-11-17)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-19)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi mikehahn@rogers.com (Mike Hahn) (2004-11-20)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-26)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-28)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi jeremy.wright@microfocus.com (Jeremy Wright) (2004-11-28)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi mikehahn@rogers.com (Mike Hahn) (2004-12-05)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi strohm@airmail.net (John R. Strohm) (2004-12-06)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 28 Nov 2004 23:19:41 -0500
Organization: AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
References: 04-11-078
Keywords: Pascal, syntax, design
Posted-Date: 28 Nov 2004 23:19:41 EST

Im Artikel 04-11-078, "Mike Hahn" <mikehahn@rogers.com>
schreibt:


>I disagree that the omission of the Java dot operator (making it
>implied) is a language flaw. If the first token (at the statement
>level) is an identifier, then the parser knows that a procedure call
>is coming. If the first token (at the expression level) is an
>identifier, then the parser knows that a function call is
>coming.


Does your language happen to have variables, too?


= foo bar oops;


DoDi


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.