|How to prove LL(1) grammar is also LR(1) firstname.lastname@example.org (2004-11-14)|
|Re: How to prove LL(1) grammar is also LR(1) email@example.com (black shark) (2004-11-17)|
|From:||"black shark" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||17 Nov 2004 11:42:42 -0500|
|Posted-Date:||17 Nov 2004 11:42:42 EST|
"Shuang" <email@example.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
> The fact is obvious, but I wonder how to prove this?
Any LL(k) grammar is also LR(k), the proof, that use the abstract
definition of LR(k) and LL(k) grammar is in the book "Parsing theory,
vol 2 LR(k9) and LL(k) parsing" (Sippu, Soisalon-Soininen.)
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.