Re: performance-oriented languages?

beliavsky@aol.com
21 Oct 2004 22:29:20 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[4 earlier articles]
Re: performance-oriented languages? barabucc@cs.unibo.it (Gioele Barabucci) (2004-10-04)
Re: performance-oriented languages? dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2004-10-09)
Re: performance-oriented languages? pkk@spth.de (Philipp Klaus Krause) (2004-10-09)
Re: performance-oriented languages? wildstf@hotmail.com (Stefano Lanzavecchia) (2004-10-12)
Re: performance-oriented languages? rrr@ieee.org (2004-10-17)
Re: performance-oriented languages? skaller@nospam.com.au (John Max Skaller) (2004-10-21)
Re: performance-oriented languages? beliavsky@aol.com (2004-10-21)
Re: performance-oriented languages? dberlin@dberlin.org (Daniel Berlin) (2004-10-23)
Re: performance-oriented languages? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2004-10-24)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: beliavsky@aol.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 21 Oct 2004 22:29:20 -0400
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: 04-10-015 04-10-033 04-10-128
Keywords: performance
Posted-Date: 21 Oct 2004 22:29:20 EDT

> > Pathscale C/C++/Fortran is marketed based on performance -- see
> > http://www.pathscale.com/products1.html .
> >
> > Portland Group markets "PGIŽ High-Performance [C/C++/Fortran]
> > Compilers and Tools" at http://www.pgroup.com/
>
> Any suggestions on where to find real-world (more particularly 3rd
> party or disinterested !) comparison experience between these two ?

Polyhedron has benchmarked Fortran 90/95 compilers on Linux Opteron --
see http://www.polyhedron.com/compare/linux/f90bench_AMD.html .

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.