|Linking with different compilers email@example.com (2004-08-23)|
|Re: Linking with different compilers firstname.lastname@example.org (Paul Pluzhnikov) (2004-08-25)|
|Re: Linking with different compilers email@example.com (Unknown) (2004-08-25)|
|Re: Linking with different compilers firstname.lastname@example.org (2004-09-03)|
|From:||email@example.com (Vidar Hokstad)|
|Date:||3 Sep 2004 12:38:56 -0400|
|Posted-Date:||03 Sep 2004 12:38:56 EDT|
Paul Pluzhnikov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:04-08-137...
> No: shared libraries on most UNIX systems are considered a "final"
> product, and can't be re-linked any more than you can re-link an
> existing executable.
While what you say above is in general true, and all the caveats about
object layout etc. changing in the bit of your post I snipped is true
too, it is _possible_ to make an existing dynamically linked
executable static on Linux at least:
It's not a nice solution, and the webpage makes that quite clear, but
it can be useful in some situations.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.