Re: Garbage collection

Sebastian <sk@z.pl>
23 Aug 2004 12:07:18 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[8 earlier articles]
Re: Garbage collection gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2004-08-11)
Re: Garbage collection nick.roberts@acm.org (Nick Roberts) (2004-08-13)
Re: Garbage collection t.zielonka@zodiac.mimuw.edu.pl (Tomasz Zielonka) (2004-08-13)
Re: Garbage collection antti-juhani@kaijanaho.info (Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho) (2004-08-15)
Re: Garbage collection gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2004-08-15)
Re: Garbage collection nick.roberts@acm.org (Nick Roberts) (2004-08-23)
Re: Garbage collection sk@z.pl (Sebastian) (2004-08-23)
Re: Garbage collection sk@z.pl (Sebastian) (2004-08-23)
Re: Garbage collection nick.roberts@acm.org (Nick Roberts) (2004-09-03)
Re: Garbage collection sk@bez.spamu.z.pl (Sebastian) (2004-09-07)
Re: Garbage collection usenet@leapheap.co.uk (2004-09-13)
Re: Garbage Collection eifrig@blaze.cs.jhu.edu (1992-08-09)
Re: Garbage Collection boehm@parc.xerox.com (1992-08-11)
[4 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Sebastian <sk@z.pl>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 23 Aug 2004 12:07:18 -0400
Organization: in Forma
References: 04-07-085 04-08-011 04-08-086
Keywords: GC
Posted-Date: 23 Aug 2004 12:07:18 EDT

Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
> Sebastian wrote:
>> You can read the following 2-part article from MSDN. It quite nicely
>> explains how .Net garbage collector works -- it's also (partly*) copying
>> & generational collector at one (it even has 2 generations).
>
> If it had only 1 generation, it wouldn't be generational.

Well, it could have more. And, AFAIU, OP was also asking about 2... So it's
quite well matching.

rgds

Sebastian Kaliszewski

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.