|GOLD Parser News: Version 2.2 was released! GOLDParser@DevinCook.com (2004-04-29)|
|Re: GOLD Parser News: Version 2.2 was released! firstname.lastname@example.org (TOUATI Sid) (2004-05-02)|
|From:||TOUATI Sid <email@example.com>|
|Date:||2 May 2004 21:54:00 -0400|
|Organization:||Universite de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines|
|Posted-Date:||02 May 2004 21:54:00 EDT|
Gold seems fine, but I am really wondering what is its main advantage
against the classical lex&yacc.
You said :
> Unlike common compiler-compilers, the GOLD Parser does not require
> you to embed your grammar directly into your source code. Instead,
> the Builder analyzes the grammar description and saves the parse
> tables to a separate file.
lex&yacc also can generate the table in a separate file by using the
Thanks for clarifying.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.