Re: How about VLIW used as RISC?

Ricardo Bugalho <ricardo.b@zmail.pt>
29 Apr 2004 12:05:22 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
How about VLIW used as RISC? ronald@interqos.com (2004-04-28)
Re: How about VLIW used as RISC? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2004-04-29)
Re: How about VLIW used as RISC? ricardo.b@zmail.pt (Ricardo Bugalho) (2004-04-29)
Re: How about VLIW used as RISC? torbenm@diku.dk (2004-04-29)
Re: How about VLIW used as RISC? MitchAlsup@aol.com (2004-04-29)
Re: How about VLIW used as RISC? alexc@std.com (Alex Colvin) (2004-05-02)
Re: How about VLIW used as RISC? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2004-05-02)
Re: How about VLIW used as RISC? stanlass@netins.net (Stan Lass) (2004-05-02)
Re: How about VLIW used as RISC? sander@haldjas.folklore.ee (Sander Vesik) (2004-05-08)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Ricardo Bugalho <ricardo.b@zmail.pt>
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.compilers
Date: 29 Apr 2004 12:05:22 -0400
Organization: Netvisao, A sua Internet por Cabo
References: 04-04-088
Keywords: architecture
Posted-Date: 29 Apr 2004 12:05:22 EDT

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:33:26 -0400, Ron wrote:


> So what is your opinion?


VLIW is only interesting if you want to build a one way (one instruction
word) in-order CPU. Anything else, plain old RISC is simpler.


--
Ricardo

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.