| Related articles |
|---|
| [4 earlier articles] |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? jgd@cix.co.uk (2004-01-16) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? derkgwen@HotPOP.com (Derk Gwen) (2004-01-16) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? torbenm@diku.dk (2004-01-16) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-01-16) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-01-16) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? Martin.Ward@durham.ac.uk (Martin Ward) (2004-01-16) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? vbdis@aol.com (2004-01-16) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2004-01-18) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2004-01-22) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2004-01-22) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? torbenm@diku.dk (2004-01-31) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-01-31) |
| Re: Detecting endless recursion? witness@t-online.de (Uli Kusterer) (2004-02-01) |
| [16 later articles] |
| From: | vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 16 Jan 2004 23:03:42 -0500 |
| Organization: | AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com |
| References: | 04-01-070 |
| Keywords: | debug |
| Posted-Date: | 16 Jan 2004 23:03:42 EST |
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> schreibt:
>It depends a lot on your programming style. 100 nesting levels is too
>small for some programs. If you do have a fixed limit, make sure that
>it can be increased without recompiling the program (e.g. allow the
>user to set the limit from an environment variable or command-line
>option).
IMO it's preferrable to have the appropriate value in an configuration
file. For an interpreter a (pseudo) statement can be added to the
language, allowing to set the stack limit for every single program as
required.
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.