|State-of-the-art parser generation? firstname.lastname@example.org (2003-12-13)|
|Re: State-of-the-art parser generation? email@example.com (Chris F Clark) (2003-12-14)|
|Date:||13 Dec 2003 21:05:33 -0500|
|Organization:||EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!|
|Posted-Date:||13 Dec 2003 21:05:33 EST|
Since I've seen a bunch of people here that LALR(1) was a tad
out-of-date, what would be considered state-of-the-art when it comes
to parser generation approaches nowadays? I'm especially interested
in parsers that can do a decent job of diagnostics and recovery in
case of syntax errors in the input data. And also in the
maintainability of the grammar itself.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.