State-of-the-art parser generation?

galibert@pobox.com
13 Dec 2003 21:05:33 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
State-of-the-art parser generation? galibert@pobox.com (2003-12-13)
Re: State-of-the-art parser generation? cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2003-12-14)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: galibert@pobox.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 13 Dec 2003 21:05:33 -0500
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
Keywords: parse, question
Posted-Date: 13 Dec 2003 21:05:33 EST

Since I've seen a bunch of people here that LALR(1) was a tad
out-of-date, what would be considered state-of-the-art when it comes
to parser generation approaches nowadays? I'm especially interested
in parsers that can do a decent job of diagnostics and recovery in
case of syntax errors in the input data. And also in the
maintainability of the grammar itself.


    OG.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.