|Pushes, Pops, NOPS email@example.com (2003-12-03)|
|Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS Barak.Zalstein@ParthusCeva.com (Barak Zalstein) (2003-12-08)|
|Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS firstname.lastname@example.org (2003-12-08)|
|Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS email@example.com (Nick Roberts) (2003-12-08)|
|Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS firstname.lastname@example.org (Ken Rose) (2003-12-08)|
|Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS email@example.com (2003-12-08)|
|Re: Pushes, Pops, NOPS firstname.lastname@example.org (Lex Spoon) (2003-12-13)|
|From:||Nick Roberts <email@example.com>|
|Date:||8 Dec 2003 00:24:32 -0500|
|Posted-Date:||08 Dec 2003 00:24:32 EST|
> If I added some "NOPS" in between each of the instructions above just
> to make the code look bigger, is there any option while compiling with
> GCC which would eliminate all those unnecessary "NOPS" and then
> convert the remaining code to binary?
If there were such an option, it could introduce some really gnarly bugs
into certain programs. Supposing one of the 'unnecessary' NOPs was in
between an STI and a CLI? Hehe.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.