|Question about MS C code generation email@example.com (2003-11-21)|
|Re: Question about MS C code generation firstname.lastname@example.org (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-12-03)|
|Re: Question about MS C code generation email@example.com (2003-12-03)|
|Re: Question about MS C code generation firstname.lastname@example.org (2003-12-03)|
|Re: Question about MS C code generation email@example.com (2003-12-03)|
|From:||Joachim Durchholz <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||3 Dec 2003 17:54:23 -0500|
|Organization:||Oberberg Online Infosysteme|
|Posted-Date:||03 Dec 2003 17:54:23 EST|
> my question is: 1) refer to the comment parts
> 2) was it any good, probably for the optimization purpose ?
> 3) what kinda logic style would you prefer ?
> 4) if asked, how would you write this program in assembly ?
Can't answer to the other question, but the answer to (4) is definitely a No.
I write only highly time-critical stuff in assembly. Even then, I first
code in a high-level language, then I profile, then I look at the code
that's /diagnosed/ as time-critical, not that the code that I /thought/
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.