|[3 earlier articles]|
|Re: Argument passing conventions and optimization firstname.lastname@example.org (Marco van de Voort) (2003-10-31)|
|Re: Argument passing conventions and optimization email@example.com (2003-11-01)|
|Re: Argument passing conventions and optimization firstname.lastname@example.org (pradeep tumati) (2003-11-02)|
|Re: Argument passing conventions and optimization email@example.com (2003-11-08)|
|Re: Argument passing conventions and optimization bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2003-11-08)|
|Re: Argument passing conventions and optimization firstname.lastname@example.org (Rob Thorpe) (2003-11-11)|
|Re: Argument passing conventions and optimization email@example.com (2003-11-11)|
|From:||firstname.lastname@example.org (Nick Maclaren)|
|Date:||11 Nov 2003 14:34:41 -0500|
|Organization:||University of Cambridge, England|
|References:||03-10-116 03-10-153 03-11-018 03-11-035|
|Posted-Date:||11 Nov 2003 14:34:41 EST|
Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:
>pradeep tumati <email@example.com> writes:
>> Does this case even apply to parameter passing in the case of static
>> functions (in C)? Logically, we can perform optimization, but I am not
>> sure what kind of side effects this causes... The same can be the case
>> with functions calling other functions within the same C++ Namespace.
>One side effect might be that the debugger is utterly confused.
>Presuming one is trying to use a so-called "language-independent"
Right in one.
>It seems to me that a compiler for a particular language ought to be
>allowed to choose its own calling conventions in at least *some*
>circumstances. (Like, no debugging, the call is not inter-langage, the
>call is not calling a library routine).
They can, and always have done. It was near-universal under IBM
MVT and MVS, where the standard linkage was (a) very slow and
(b) poorly suited to many languages.
>> There could be a scenario where this kind of optimization can be
>> entrusted to the linker, but I guess its going to be a costly
>> stuff. Any thoughts...?
>Have we got to the point where link-time optimizations are worthwhile?
Many HPC vendors (system manufacturers and third-party) think so.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.