Re: Register allocation

15 Jul 2003 23:40:36 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Register allocation (2003-07-04)
Re: Register allocation (TOUATI Sid) (2003-07-15)
Register allocation (Rob Thorpe) (2003-07-21)
Re: Register allocation (2003-07-21)
Re: Register allocation (2003-07-21)
Re: Register allocation (Dan) (2003-07-21)
Re: Register allocation (2003-07-31)
Register allocation (2004-07-15)
[27 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: TOUATI Sid <>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 15 Jul 2003 23:40:36 -0400
Organization: Universite de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
References: 03-07-058
Keywords: optimize
Posted-Date: 15 Jul 2003 23:40:35 EDT


It is hard to say why a compiler didn't make this or that optimization.
Maybe the number of free registers isn't sufficient (I am not familiar
with the MCORE platform).
However, be sure that gcc isn't the most efficient compiler in terms of
code optimization, especially with backend opptimization. Maybe by using
the keywork "register" for your global variables, you can help gcc to


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.