|C# for java email@example.com (Francois Gagnon) (2003-04-15)|
|Re: C# for java firstname.lastname@example.org (Stefano Lanzavecchia) (2003-04-20)|
|Re: C# for java email@example.com (Oliver Zeigermann) (2003-04-20)|
|Re: C# for java bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2003-04-27)|
|Re: C# for java firstname.lastname@example.org (Sander Vesik) (2003-04-27)|
|Re: C# for java email@example.com (Randall R Schulz) (2003-05-06)|
|Re: C# for java firstname.lastname@example.org (Sander Vesik) (2003-05-15)|
|From:||Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>|
|Date:||27 Apr 2003 02:03:01 -0400|
|Organization:||The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA|
|Posted-Date:||27 Apr 2003 02:03:00 EDT|
Oliver Zeigermann <email@example.com> writes:
> As there are certain constructs in C# (local objects stored on stack,
> listeners as integrated part of the language, etc.) that are not
> supported by the JVM, I would say this is impossible.
My company sells Ada compilers. One of our targets is JVM.
Ada has many constructs (you meantion local "stack" objects)
that do not fit "nicely" into the JVM. But it can be done.
The compiler just has to jump through some hoops.
I see no reason it couldn't be done for C#, too.
- Bob Duff
Vice President, Engineering
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.