Re: Can shift/reduce problems be eliminated?

Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
7 Jan 2003 23:29:53 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Can shift/reduce problems be eliminated? vugluskr@unicorn.math.spbu.ru (2002-12-31)
Re: Can shift/reduce problems be eliminated? cdc@maxnet.co.nz (Carl Cerecke) (2002-12-31)
Re: Can shift/reduce problems be eliminated? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2003-01-04)
Re: Can shift/reduce problems be eliminated? bonzini@gnu.org (2003-01-04)
Re: Can shift/reduce problems be eliminated? vugluskr@unicorn.math.spbu.ru (2003-01-04)
Re: Can shift/reduce problems be eliminated? cdc@maxnet.co.nz (Carl Cerecke) (2003-01-07)
Re: Can shift/reduce problems be eliminated? bje@redhat.com (Ben Elliston) (2003-01-07)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 7 Jan 2003 23:29:53 -0500
Organization: Red Hat Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd
References: 02-12-121 02-12-137 03-01-018
Keywords: parse, practice
Posted-Date: 07 Jan 2003 23:29:53 EST

>>>>> "Roman" == Roman Shaposhnick <vugluskr@unicorn.math.spbu.ru> writes:


    Roman> C++ language is one example of this happening, because if
    Roman> I'm not mistaken g++ is going to throw formal specification
    Roman> away and code it by hand.


The GCC project just did it last week. :-)


Ben

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.