| Related articles |
|---|
| Interaction between optimizer and inline asm in gcc? colohan+@cs.cmu.edu (Christopher Brian Colohan) (2002-05-17) |
| Re: Interaction between optimizer and inline asm in gcc? loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de (2002-05-23) |
| Re: Interaction between optimizer and inline asm in gcc? sam@zoy.org (2002-05-23) |
| Re: Interaction between optimizer and inline asm in gcc? journeyman@compilerguru.com (2002-05-23) |
| Re: Interaction between optimizer and inline asm in gcc? kg_russell@yahoo.co.uk (2002-05-23) |
| From: | Christopher Brian Colohan <colohan+@cs.cmu.edu> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 17 May 2002 00:27:03 -0400 |
| Organization: | Carnegie Mellon Univ. -- Computer Science Dept. |
| Keywords: | GCC, question |
| Posted-Date: | 17 May 2002 00:27:03 EDT |
I am working on an architecture research project where we are using
inline assembly instructions to instrument and change the behaviour of
loops.
I was wondering if anyone has looked into the impact of doing this on
gcc's optimizer: in other words, how conservatively does gcc treat
inline asm statements? For example, would inserting such a statement
inhibit loop unrolling?
Thanks!
Chris
--
Chris Colohan Email: chris@colohan.ca PGP: finger colohan@cs.cmu.edu
Web: www.cs.cmu.edu/~colohan Phone: (412)268-4751
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.