Re: Processor specific optimisations

"Peter H. Froehlich" <pfroehli@ics.uci.edu>
18 Jan 2002 21:03:05 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Processor specific optimisations mpointie@eden-studios.fr (MickaŽl Pointier) (2002-01-17)
Re: Processor specific optimisations pfroehli@ics.uci.edu (Peter H. Froehlich) (2002-01-18)
Re: Processor specific optimisations dave@cyclicode.net (Dave Hudson) (2002-01-18)
Re: Processor specific optimisations rickh@capaccess.org (2002-01-18)
Re: Processor specific optimisations usenet@gehre.org (2002-01-18)
Re: Processor specific optimisations walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2002-01-24)
Re: Processor specific optimisations jgd@cix.co.uk (2002-01-24)
Re: Processor specific optimisations thp@cs.ucr.edu (2002-01-24)
[9 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: "Peter H. Froehlich" <pfroehli@ics.uci.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 18 Jan 2002 21:03:05 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 02-01-077
Keywords: optimize
Posted-Date: 18 Jan 2002 21:03:05 EST

Hi!


On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 09:34 , MickaŽl Pointier wrote:


> So, the question finaly is: Is it possible to apply the modern
> compiler optimisation strategies to this old processor and have a
> result that an experimented 6502 assembly coder would have a hard time
> to beat ?


This is just off the top of my head, but I would think that you should
look what *old* compilers did for similar *old* machines and then try
to add that stuff in your favorite compiler. Just my $0.02...


Peter
--
Peter H. Froehlich []->[!]<-[] http://nil.ics.uci.edu/~phf/
OpenPGP: D465 CBDD D9D2 0D77 C5AF 353E C86C 2AD9 A6E2 309E


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.