|new language syntax email@example.com (Aleksey Beregov) (2001-08-24)|
|Re: new language syntax firstname.lastname@example.org (2001-08-25)|
|Re: new language syntax email@example.com (2001-08-25)|
|Re: new language syntax firstname.lastname@example.org (2001-09-21)|
|Re: new language syntax email@example.com (HSM) (2001-09-25)|
|Re: new language syntax firstname.lastname@example.org (Ralph Boland) (2001-09-26)|
|Re: new language syntax email@example.com (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-10-06)|
|Re: new language syntax firstname.lastname@example.org (2001-10-20)|
|Re: new language syntax email@example.com (Chris F Clark) (2001-11-05)|
|Date:||25 Sep 2001 00:22:02 -0400|
|References:||01-08-138 01-08-144 01-09-097|
|Posted-Date:||25 Sep 2001 00:22:02 EDT|
> > | I am developing the syntax for a language which should [must] be very
> > | suitable for working with sets, collections and other aggregate types.
> APL was designed for it.
> Scheme macros and higher order programming are also a nice solution
> [APL was certainly designed for arrays, but you have to do sets,
> collections &c yourself -John]
Whatever happened to SETL, Dewer's PL for playing with sets?
Cmptng Delivery Sys.Generalist/4 POBox 3707, m/c 4E-81, Seattle, WA 98124-2207
firstname.lastname@example.org http://warlok.ds.boeing.com/~howie/ (206)662-0189
[It's 30 years old but still pretty cool. A Google search quickly found
lots of SETL materials. -John]
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.