|new language syntax firstname.lastname@example.org (Aleksey Beregov) (2001-08-24)|
|Re: new language syntax email@example.com (2001-08-25)|
|Re: new language syntax firstname.lastname@example.org (2001-08-25)|
|Re: new language syntax email@example.com (2001-09-21)|
|Re: new language syntax firstname.lastname@example.org (HSM) (2001-09-25)|
|Re: new language syntax email@example.com (Ralph Boland) (2001-09-26)|
|Re: new language syntax firstname.lastname@example.org (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-10-06)|
|Re: new language syntax email@example.com (2001-10-20)|
|Re: new language syntax firstname.lastname@example.org (Chris F Clark) (2001-11-05)|
|Date:||21 Sep 2001 23:42:21 -0400|
|Posted-Date:||21 Sep 2001 23:42:20 EDT|
email@example.com (Tim Olson) wrote in message news:01-08-144...
> "Aleksey Beregov" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> | I am developing the syntax for a language which should [must] be very
> | suitable for working with sets, collections and other aggregate types.
APL was designed for it.
Scheme macros and higher order programming are also a nice solution
[APL was certainly designed for arrays, but you have to do sets,
collections &c yourself -John]
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.