|Re: Is C++ LL(k)? email@example.com (Lin Gu) (2001-07-23)|
|Re: Is C++ LL(k)? firstname.lastname@example.org (2001-07-27)|
|Re: Is C++ LL(k)? email@example.com (Mike Dimmick) (2001-07-27)|
|Re: Is C++ LL(k)? firstname.lastname@example.org (2001-08-06)|
|Date:||6 Aug 2001 04:07:13 -0400|
|Organization:||Road Runner - NC|
|References:||<email@example.com> <mSZ67.firstname.lastname@example.org> 01-07-138|
|Posted-Date:||06 Aug 2001 04:07:13 EDT|
On 23 Jul 2001 23:26:05 -0400, Lin Gu <email@example.com> wrote:
>However, I may have to use an LL(k) compiler generator (Antlr) to
>write a compiler for it. Is it difficult? It is expected that I need
It certainly is hard.
>to add some rules to disambiguate, but I want to know whether this is
The task is difficult enough that before anyone can answer whether it's
feasible, you'll need to assess just how badly you need to parse C++.
What are you planning to do?
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.