Re: Parsing a simple BASIC language

"Barry Kelly" <barry_j_kelly@hotmail.com>
22 Apr 2001 23:52:41 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: Parsing a simple BASIC language christl@fmi.uni-passau.de (2001-04-12)
Re: Parsing a simple BASIC language paul.dunn4@ntlworld.com (Dunny) (2001-04-12)
Re: Parsing a simple BASIC language barry_j_kelly@hotmail.com (Barry Kelly) (2001-04-14)
Re: Parsing a simple BASIC language marcov@toad.stack.nl (2001-04-18)
Re: Parsing a simple BASIC language michael@moria.de (2001-04-18)
Re: Parsing a simple BASIC language paul.dunn4@ntlworld.com (Dunny) (2001-04-22)
Re: Parsing a simple BASIC language barry_j_kelly@hotmail.com (Barry Kelly) (2001-04-22)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Barry Kelly" <barry_j_kelly@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 Apr 2001 23:52:41 -0400
Organization: Ireland On-Line Customer
References: 01-04-014 01-04-039 01-04-074 01-04-097 01-04-110
Keywords: Basic, parse
Posted-Date: 22 Apr 2001 23:52:41 EDT

> If you like Parser10, have a look at
>
> http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/symbolic.zip


I don't particularly <g>; it has a horrible parsing speed (about 50
times slower than simple recursive descent), but a fairly efficient
evaluation method (a three-address code variant), while Marcov's code
uses an RPN stack machine.


> P.s. is Object Pascal LL(1)?


Strictly, no. With context, you can manage it.


-- Barry

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.