|SDL to C code convertor performance. firstname.lastname@example.org (Vishal Kulshrestha) (2001-03-22)|
|Re: SDL to C code convertor performance. email@example.com (2001-03-26)|
|Re: SDL to C code convertor performance. firstname.lastname@example.org (Vishal Kulshrestha) (2001-04-04)|
|From:||"Vishal Kulshrestha" <email@example.com>|
|Date:||4 Apr 2001 00:21:51 -0400|
|Posted-Date:||04 Apr 2001 00:21:51 EDT|
Eric O'Dell wrote
> On 22 Mar 2001 01:19:06 -0500, Vishal Kulshrestha <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >I'm looking for performance figures of existing SDL to C code convertors
> >(like telelogic tau). Can someone suggest how optimal such convertors are
> >terms of code size, mips and memory?
> I'm not sure that's a meaningful question unless you ask how optimal the
> converter is in conjunction with a specific C compiler.
It does, because SDL is a fairly high level language and the compiler i'm
is basically a source to source transformation tool: SDL to C language
convertor. I was
just wondering if someone has data on what is the footprint of such
conversions and how
optimal SDL to C transformation in general is compared to hand written code
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.