Re: Hand-written parsers?

"Sebastian Moleski" <smoleski@surakware.com>
24 Dec 2000 16:01:48 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Hand-written parsers? thomas.luzat@gmx.net (Thomas Luzat) (2000-12-23)
Re: Hand-written parsers? mike@dimmick.demon.co.uk (Mike Dimmick) (2000-12-24)
Re: Hand-written parsers? smoleski@surakware.com (Sebastian Moleski) (2000-12-24)
Re: Hand-written parsers? jparis11@home.com (Jean Pariseau) (2000-12-24)
Re: Hand-written parsers? LLkParsing@aol.com (2000-12-31)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Sebastian Moleski" <smoleski@surakware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 24 Dec 2000 16:01:48 -0500
Organization: T-Online
References: 00-12-102
Keywords: parse, C++
Posted-Date: 24 Dec 2000 16:01:48 EST

"Thomas Luzat" <thomas.luzat@gmx.net>:
> I'm wondering a bit what most commercial (mainly C++) compilers use:
> Hand-written parsers or parsers generated by compilers such as yacc?


Borland C++ uses a recursive-descending hand-crafted parser. And it's
one of the fastest while standard conforming compilers out there.


sm

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.