Re: General byte-codes reference

Daniel Dunbar <evilzr@yahoo.com>
8 Dec 2000 22:22:44 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
General byte-codes reference mak@imakhno.freeserve.co.uk (Makhno) (2000-12-07)
Re: General byte-codes reference s337240@student.uq.edu.au (Trent Waddington) (2000-12-08)
Re: General byte-codes reference evilzr@yahoo.com (Daniel Dunbar) (2000-12-08)
Re: General byte-codes reference anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2000-12-11)
Re: General byte-codes reference midkiff@watson.ibm.com (2000-12-11)
Re: General byte-codes reference Norman_member@newsguy.com (Norman Culver) (2000-12-18)
Re: General byte-codes reference brangdon@cix.compulink.co.uk (2000-12-18)
Re: General byte-codes reference patc@acm.org (Pat Caudill) (2000-12-18)
Re: General byte-codes reference sjmeyer@www.tdl.com (2000-12-20)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Daniel Dunbar <evilzr@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 8 Dec 2000 22:22:44 -0500
Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
References: 00-12-030
Keywords: interpreter
Posted-Date: 08 Dec 2000 22:22:44 EST

You may find the following paper interesting, it details the design of
the virtual machine for the Inferno operating platform, and discusses
some of the tradeoffs that were made, mostly with regard to memory
bandwidth and on-the-fly compilation support.


http://www.vitanuova.com/inferno/papers/hotchips.html
--
daniel dunbar
evilzr@yahoo.com


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.