Re: Using C as a back end

nr@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (Norman Ramsey)
31 Oct 2000 14:31:51 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[11 earlier articles]
Re: Using C as a back end sweeks@my-deja.com (Stephen T. Weeks) (2000-10-23)
Re: Using C as a back end jaidi@fos.ubd.edu.bn (Pg Nor Jaidi Pg Tuah) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end predictor@my-deja.com (Pred.) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end ONeillCJ@logica.com (Conor O'Neill) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end kst@cts.com (Keith Thompson) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end nr@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (2000-10-31)
Re: Using C as a back end sweeks@my-deja.com (Stephen T. Weeks) (2000-10-31)
Re: Using C as a back end zs@ender.cs.mu.oz.au (2000-10-31)
Re: Using C as a back end thp@cs.ucr.edu (Tom Payne) (2000-10-31)
Re: Using C as a back end engler@Stanford.EDU (2000-10-31)
Re: Using C as a back end anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2000-10-31)
Re: Using C as a back end joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-10-31)
[11 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: nr@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (Norman Ramsey)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 31 Oct 2000 14:31:51 -0500
Organization: Harvard University
References: 00-10-148 00-10-164 00-10-189
Keywords: C, performance
Posted-Date: 31 Oct 2000 14:31:50 EST

Pred. <predictor@my-deja.com> wrote:
>C-- may very well become an interesting option, but IMO it's far from
>ready for production compilers.


I can say authoritatively that while we hope that C-- becomes an
interesting option, it is far from ready for *any* compilers. We hope
to have an interesting prototype early next year, and once we reach
that point, you can promote C-- to `far from ready for *production*
compilers'.:-)


--
Norman Ramsey
http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~nr

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.