Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| AT&T lex port jbrink@chat.carleton.ca (2000-10-19) |
| Re: AT&T lex port toor@y1.jdyson.net (2000-10-22) |
| Re: AT&T lex port broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de (Hans-Bernhard Broeker) (2000-10-22) |
| Re: AT&T lex port paule@martex.gen.oh.us (Paul Evans) (2000-10-23) |
| Re: AT&T lex port paule@martex.gen.oh.us (Paul Evans) (2000-10-26) |
| Re: AT&T lex port g.douglas@readytext.co.uk (Graham Douglas) (2001-01-09) |
| From: | Paul Evans <paule@martex.gen.oh.us> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 23 Oct 2000 22:10:23 -0400 |
| Organization: | Martex, Corp. |
| References: | 00-10-145 |
| Keywords: | lex |
Jason Brink wrote:
>
> Does anyone know of a port of AT&T lex to Windows NT/2000 or Linux? I
> know flex is better than AT&T lex, but I'm currently doing a co-op
<cut>
I think AT&T research's (David Korn mainly I think) UWIN might
be suitable, you can find the project at:
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/uwin/
(UWIN is a Windows port of UNIX user programs, not all are included,
but most except for cc which is a wrapper for MSVC)
For commercial use it's a commercial product, it's "free" (not in
the GNU sense) for others.
And there's always Microsoft's adopted Interix product at:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/
(I don't know where it's sourced from code wise)
-Paul
[Uwin looks like it uses the freeware versions of lex and yacc, which
means flex. Dunno about Microsoft. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.