|Verifying a compiler email@example.com (Steven Carroll) (2000-06-14)|
|Re: Verifying a compiler firstname.lastname@example.org (2000-06-20)|
|Re: Verifying a compiler email@example.com (Taylor Hutt) (2000-06-20)|
|Re: Verifying a compiler firstname.lastname@example.org (2000-06-22)|
|Re: Verifying a compiler email@example.com (David Somers) (2000-06-22)|
|Re: Verifying a compiler firstname.lastname@example.org (Eric Christopher) (2000-06-27)|
|Re: Verifying a compiler email@example.com (Robert A Duff) (2000-06-27)|
|Re: Verifying a compiler firstname.lastname@example.org (Iain A F Fleming) (2000-06-30)|
|Re: Verifying a compiler email@example.com (2000-06-30)|
|Re: Verifying a compiler firstname.lastname@example.org (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-07-04)|
|From:||Iain A F Fleming <email@example.com>|
|Date:||30 Jun 2000 00:51:10 -0400|
|Organization:||Kororaa Ultra Light Engineering|
Taylor Hutt wrote:
> Plum Hall (language compilance)
> There is a competitor to Plum Hall, but I can't remember the name
> right now.
Perennial is its name.
I haven't used it for a few years, so I can't remember the producer.
I also found that using both was useful, albeit expensive.
> Nullstone (optimizations / code generation)
Again, a very useful tool, especially alongside P-H and Perennial.
> > FORTRAN anyone?
NAG (Numerical Algorithms Group, www.nag.co.uk) market an F90/F95
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.