|Smalltalk 'cascades' Timothy_S_Coffey@mail.bankone.com (2000-05-18)|
|Re: Smalltalk 'cascades' firstname.lastname@example.org (2000-05-20)|
|Date:||18 May 2000 01:25:57 -0400|
|Organization:||Deja.com - Before you buy.|
I was wondering if anyone knows if it is possible to construct a parse
table for 'cascades' in Smalltalk. Every set of transitions I could
come up with all fell short in some way (usually with keyword
messages). I finally ended up doing a compile-time simulation of the
run-time Smalltalk stack in order to correctly generate code for a
Still, I would think a parse table-only solution is still possible.
It would definitely be cleaner!
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.