|Debugger Links. firstname.lastname@example.org (Naresh Chainani) (2000-04-25)|
|Re: Debugger Links. bob.zulawnik@NOSPAM.cportcorp.com (Bob Zulawnik) (2000-04-26)|
|Re: Debugger Links. email@example.com (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-04-30)|
|From:||"Joachim Durchholz" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||30 Apr 2000 00:18:11 -0400|
A minor nit to pick...
Bob Zulawnik <bob.zulawnik@NOSPAM.cportcorp.com> wrote:
> Some CPUs (notably x86) provide a hardware support for
> single-stepping. It is a single-step bit, which when toggled causes
> single-stepping (i.e. trapping after executing a single user-mode
Agreed. However, ...
> In this case there is no need to place breakpoints.
Only if the user is single-stepping. It would be a very bad idea to
implement breakpoints by singlestepping and comparing the instruction
pointer with breakpoint addresses.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.