|[3 earlier articles]|
|Re: Stack based machines email@example.com (Pieter Koopman) (2000-03-25)|
|Re: Stack based machines firstname.lastname@example.org (2000-03-25)|
|Re: Stack based machines email@example.com (2000-03-25)|
|Re: Stack based machines firstname.lastname@example.org (2000-03-25)|
|Re: Stack based machines email@example.com (Deepak Janardhanan) (2000-03-25)|
|Re: Stack based machines firstname.lastname@example.org (Philip Koopman) (2000-03-25)|
|Re: Stack based machines Keith@wootten.demon.co.uk (Keith Wootten) (2000-03-28)|
|Re: Stack based machines email@example.com (Bernd Paysan) (2000-03-28)|
|Re: Stack based machines firstname.lastname@example.org (Deepak Janardhanan) (2000-03-28)|
|From:||Keith Wootten <Keith@wootten.demon.co.uk>|
|Date:||28 Mar 2000 01:00:32 -0500|
>Linus Thand <email@example.com> wrote:
>> What is happening in the world of stack-based machines?
>> Are there any active groups working on processors or
>> compilers (I'm especially interested in functional languages).
There's the PSC1000 from Patriot Scientific at www.ptsc.com
It's a 32 bit dual stack machine with on-chip stacks and lots of spare
registers as well. Each 32bit opcode in fact comprises 4 x 8bit opcodes
which operate sequentially at full clock speed thus reducing the memory
It's a very clever and unorthodox chip design with lots of features,
including all sorts of memory management stuff and a separate on-chip
I/O processor. Unorthodox frightens some people.
It's also inexpensive, low power and very fast. Patriot supply C and
Java, and Forth Inc supply - you guessed it - Forth. The instruction
set maps very well to Forth's virtual machine, making it almost an
*actual* machine. Forth frightens some people.
The documentation is good quality and in .pdf format. Be bold.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.